was successfully added to your cart.


Fan Film Friday: One of the Very First Star Trek Fan Films

By July 24, 2015 January 10th, 2024 Captain's Log

Jonathan Lane is a guest blogger, and long time fan/veteran of the Star Trek fan film scene.


Estimates from the Vulcan Academy of Sciences place the number of Star Trek fan films currently on YouTube and Vimeo at approximately 16,489,247.  Personally, I think that’s a little low.  But let’s face it: there’s a LOT of Star Trek fan films out there!

And unless you have waaaaaaay too much free time on your hands, you probably can’t watch every Star Trek fan film.  And that’s where this blog comes in.  As much as we’re all Axanar groupies here at Axablog HQ, we also love many of the other fine fan films coming from a wide range of dedicated, passionate, and hard-working Trekkers.  So we’re planning to spotlight a bunch of our favorites, telling you exactly why we think they’re MUST SEE STAR TREK.

But before we begin looking at some of the best and brightest the fans have to offer, I thought it would be a hoot to look back on one of the very first-ever Star Trek fan films.
No, it’s not New Voyages or Hidden Frontier.  They’re barely a decade and a half old!  We need to set the Guardian of Forever to the year 1974!

Through the gateway mists, we see that the original Star Trek has been showing only in reruns for the past half-decade, although Filmation has just finished airing its first season of an animated Star Trek cartoon show.  George Lucas is still tweaking a first-draft screenplay called “The Star Wars,” and the first Star Trek feature film is over half a decade away.

Many fans are hungry – famished even! – for more Star Trek, desperate for any morsel of trivia not revealed in those 79 hour-long episodes.  Novels are getting published, blueprints and technical manuals are being worked on, and fan fiction is proliferating everywhere.  Some fans are even creating their own Star Trek home movies, although nothing is overly impressive yet.

But a fan in Michigan took things one step farther.  He spent nearly $2,000 of his own money (that’s about $15,000 today) to turn a 65-page script into a 100-minute long film entitled “Paragon’s Paragon.”  A little less than half that money went to create sets that looked like this…


That fan’s name was (and still is!) John Cosentino, a carpet-layer by trade (working for his father at the time) who was also an artist, engineer, and amateur filmmaker.  Prior to tackling what would become his magnum opus, John had made a series of shorter (12 to 30 minute) comedy films.  But Star Trek was his love, and he spent months researching materials and prices, designing and building sets and props, collecting costume patterns (and getting his mother, a seamstress, to sew them!), producing make-up prosthetics for Klingons, Organians, and a Vulcan (each alien requiring one-and-a-half to two hours to prepare in make-up), and even developing and printing his own enlarged slides for the screen displays on the bridge panels.

Along with the bridge set (built in John’s basement, of course!), he and his friends constructed a transporter room, starship mess hall, officer’s quarters, briefing room, a portion of the exterior of a shuttlecraft, and the interior of a Klingon ship.  Twelve Starfleet crew uniforms were sewn, along with two Klingon outfits and three Organian robes.  Along with make-up materials, camera equipment and batteries, and lighting… it’s a wonder John Cosentino was able to do it all for as little money as he did!

As with many productions today, the most impressive set, and the most difficult to build, was the bridge.  And remember that these were the days before TVs had the ability to freeze frame so that you could carefully measure and analyze the sets on the Trek episodes, although there were publicity photos available.  And so John did his best to design and build something that looked as close to the original Enterprise bridge as he could, and he got pretty darn close!

Wood and wood paneling was combined with cardboard/chipboard, Plexiglas, acetate, and a host of other building materials painted with oil-based paint (since water-based paint would warp the cardboard).  Buttons were colored marbles sunk halfway into a hole.  Below those marbles were 60 and 100-watt light bulbs wrapped in aluminum foil cups to reflect and intensify the light.  And because these lights got hot around materials that were flammable, they placed asbestos paper between the material and the bulb.  Yes, asbestos!  Welcome to 1974.

But the fire danger didn’t end there!  In order to have a blue glow emanate from the viewer on the science station, a powerful 500-watt bulb was placed inside.  This meant that scenes with the science officer looking into his viewer had to be filmed in only one minute max before the bulb would get too hot and burn out!  Also, a layer of Plexiglas was placed inside the viewer to protect the actor’s eyes just in case the 500-watt light bulb exploded!  Oh, the things we do for Trek.

The lights behind the bridge panels were all Christmas tree bulbs wired to blinkers, and the acetate covering the holes was painted in different translucent colors.  All told, hundreds of feet of wire, plugs, and sockets were scattered like a spider web behind those few bridge panels, and they used about 3500 watts of electricity.  The studio lights sucked another 4000 watts while filming on the bridge, and occasionally, someone upstairs making an unannounced pot of coffee or using the toaster in the kitchen upstairs would blow the fuse box!  Other disturbances during filming included the sound of the dishwasher, a flushing toilet, or even just the footsteps of someone walking around on the first floor being easily picked up by the microphones.

The story itself was loosely based on the first-ever original Star Trek novel “Spock Must Die!” by James Blish. To avoid ripping off Star Trek completely, though, the starship name was changed to the USS Paragon (hence, the title of the film: “Paragon’s Paragon”), the captain was now Richard Kirk, the first officer Mr. Sellek, Doctor Costa, Helmsman Tokato, etc.  Without going into too much detail, the Kligons find a way to project an energy field around the planet Organia, cutting off the Organians’ powers and allowing the Klingons to start an interstellar war.  In trying to beam Mr. Spock, er, Mr. Sellek through the field, he is split in two: one good and one evil.  But unlike “The Enemy Within,” they both appear identical in temperament and logic, each explaining why he alone is the true Vulcan first officer.  Ultimately, Kirk can only allow one to live, but how does he choose?


The movie was shot in Super 8 sound and color and shown at the occasional convention over the ensuing years.  So where is “Paragon’s Paragon” today?  Unfortunately, time and decay have taken their toll on the original Super 8 film, and even the beta copies made years later have given into the effects of the earth’s magnetic field.  What remains isn’t much to look at, and the sound and dialog can barely be heard now.  But there are a few highlights that have been edited together and can be found on YouTube here:


By today’s standards of green screen, digital effects, professional actors, and the resources of crowd funding, “Paragon’s Paragon” looks pretty weak in comparison.  And of course, the acting was probably not all that great, as these were just a group of Trek fans in Michigan and not classically trained thespians.  But looked at through the lens of 1974 – over four decades ago! – John Cosentino was the James Cawley and Alec Peters of his decade.

So as you watch the parade of fan films that we will review and recommend for you in the coming weeks and months, take a moment to remember John Cosentino and “Paragon’s Paragon.”  He was truly the first of us to go where no fan had gone before…


Source material from this article was obtained from a reproduction of Cinemagic Magazine #6 on this website:


Join the discussion 3 Comments

  • Interesting piece! Never had a chance to see it and I attended a few ST/SF cons in the 70s – the 90s.

  • James Schultz says:

    While reading this article I remember reading about this in Cinemagic and early issues of Starlog. Then I read at the end of the article the source material was from Cinemagic magazine. That’s awesome!! Nice to read about the old days of 8mm and Super 8 film making as I too use to shoot a lot of Super 8 films.

  • Fred says:

    Thanks for listing my blog as the source! I was always fascinated by this early fan film.

Privacy Policy