Shortly after the new fan film guidelines were announced by CBS and Paramount, a number of fans feared that these new rules would spell the end of fan films as we know them. I was among those fearing the worst, and I certainly felt a shiver of doom when, shortly thereafter, the venerable grandfather of the modern Star Trek fan film, New Voyages, announced the end of new episode production.
The biggest question fans debated was: can fan films exist within the constraints imposed by the new guidelines? Is 15 minutes long enough to tell a compelling story? Can a decent fan film be made with only $50,000 in public funding? Does a fan film need to pay professional actors and crew to be a quality production? And most of all, is it possible to have a continuing fan series if there cannot be established characters who appear in more than one 15-minute episode (or a single two-parter)?
Admitted, the answer to each of these questions is technically "yes." Nothing prevents a fan film from being made, 15 minutes long, modest budget, no paid professionals, and a one-shot story. But with all the fan productions out there already, how would they adapt to these new regulations? Would they go the way of Renegades and simply jettison all references to Star Trek out the airlock? Would they roll the dice like Star Trek Continues and race to release their final episodes, even though those final episodes would not be following the guidelines? Or would they try to conform as best they could?
In the three months immediately following the announcement of the guidelines, there was only a drip-drop of new Star Trek fan film releases. Mainly, there were a few short 5-to-8-minute episodes posted by Potemkin Pictures, which had pretty much been following most of the guidelines anyway over the years and had a good amount of footage already in the can waiting to be edited. There were also two really short-shorts, PenPals and PenPals 2 from Starship Valiant and Melbourne, respectively. Those seem to be more teaser than fan film--it's hard to tell just yet--but they appear to be following all of the guidelines, as well.
And of course, the big premiere was Star Trek Continues' latest masterpiece, the 44-minute long "Embracing the Winds," which they posted on September 3. And finally, less than a month ago, Trek Isolation released their 6-minute debut episode "Out of the Fire," which I discussed on this blog three weeks ago.
Starship Tristan, like the other Potemkin Pictures fan series, is simply changing the name of their "series" with each new episode to the title of that particular episode.
As I said, the Potemkin Pictures releases had few changes to make to conform. They simply dropped the series names "Project: Potemkin", "Starship Tristan", "Starship Deimos", etc. and had each episode's title serve as the name of the fan film release itself. In this way, they weren't releasing ongoing "series" so much as separate fan films. Of course, once they start featuring the same characters in multiple episodes, they're flirting with not being in compliance with the first guideline: "The fan production must be less than 15 minutes for a single self-contained story, or no more than 2 segments, episodes or parts, not to exceed 30 minutes total, with no additional seasons, episodes, parts, sequels or remakes." But we'll see if the studios make a fuss if the fan series has almost no budget and is following every other guideline perfectly.
For Trek Isolation, it's probably a little too soon to tell if they'll be able to comply with all the guidelines. Their first episode certainly does, but if their next episode features the same series name and characters, then it may run afoul of guideline #1.
So when all is said and done, I think there's one pretty big take-away from all of this. As much as I and many fans feel strongly that the guidelines went too far and are too restrictive, if I had to choose just one--or even part of one--to revise, it would be the portion of guideline #1 that stipulates no ongoing series: "...no more than 2 segments, episodes or parts, not to exceed 30 minutes total, with no additional seasons, episodes, parts, sequels or remakes." All the rest of them--the 15-minute time limit, the $50,000 crowd-funding cap, the moratorium on perks (everything except the "no paid professionals, which violates California Business and Professions Code, Section 16600)--all of these other guidelines seem almost reasonable in comparison to that one restriction. No ongoing series guts the heart out of so many, many fan efforts. It takes away from us forever the great characters of Aurora. It asks a man and his team who have spent years developing a set of characters and backstory to abandon all they have built and start over from scratch, and then start over from scratch again after that, and again after that...never being given an opportunity to slowly and fully explore and develop a range of characters through a series of stories that touch upon their hopes, fears, strengths, weaknesses, dreams, and aspirations . Right now, everything must be done at warp speed in just 15 minutes (30 for a two-parter): tell a compelling story, establish setting and conflict, provide backstory, drama, and develop the characters before the clock ticks down to zero. And if by some miracle you succeed, kiss those characters and settings good-bye because you can never use them again. Does Guideline #1 really protect the studios? Even capping episode length at 15 minutes, is the rest of that guideline really necessary? Or is it going too far into the realm of unreasonable constraint? I urge the studios, if they consider no other changes, please revise that first guideline. As Ronald Reagan stood in Berlin in 1987 and said, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"...I now say to CBS, "Mr. Van Citters, tear down Guideline #1!" Yeah, I know that sounded hokey, but will you add your voice to mine? If so, the SMALL ACCESS Campaign is preparing to launch Plan B. Please click here to join us.
